Global Cooperative Observatory合作经济观察
OverviewProfileSystem MapWatch ListThemesCasesGlossaryMonthly Watch

System Map

System Map

Understanding the structure of China's supply and marketing cooperatives: the vertical hierarchy of federations, the horizontal layer of federation-owned enterprises, associations and platforms, and the "dual-line" relationship between the two.

All-China Federation of Supply and Marketing Cooperatives (ACFSMC)
National federation · apex body and industry-guidance hub of the system
↓
Provincial Supply and Marketing Cooperatives
32 provincial-level federations · regional coordination
↓
Prefectural / County Supply and Marketing Cooperatives
The connecting tier · county federations are the key pivot for business and services
↓
Primary Cooperatives / Village Comprehensive Service Cooperatives
The frontline serving farmers directly

Horizontal links at every tier

Federation-owned enterprises
Business entities capitalised by federations at each level (agricultural inputs, circulation, cold chain, recycling, etc.), forming the market-facing business line
Sectoral associations
Specialised associations for cotton, tea, fruit, agricultural inputs and more, providing industry organisation and services
Platform companies
Such as China Coop E-commerce (the “832 Platform”), handling e-commerce, procurement and digitalisation functions
Services-for-Agriculture Centres
County- and township-level service hubs that deliver socialised agricultural services
The supply and marketing cooperative system runs on a dual-line model: federations at each level form an industry-guidance line (the cooperative line), while federation-owned enterprises form a market-facing business line (the enterprise line). The two lines are kept separate yet coordinated — the single most important point for making sense of the system.

Guide · How to understand China's supply and marketing cooperative system

For outside readers, "supply and marketing cooperatives" are neither a government department nor an ordinary company, but a comprehensive cooperative economic system serving agriculture. Nearly seventy years old, the system spans multiple tiers from the national level down to the villages, combining policy-oriented, public-interest functions with market operations carried out through affiliated enterprises.

What it is made of

Vertically, it is a chain of federations: the national federation (ACFSMC) → provincial federations → prefectural/county federations → primary cooperatives / village comprehensive service cooperatives. Horizontally, each tier may capitalise federation-owned enterprises (agricultural inputs, farm-produce circulation, cold chain, recycling, e-commerce and more), and is linked to a range of sectoral associations and platform companies.

The dual-line model

Internally, the system separates the "cooperative" from the "enterprise": federations (the "cooperative" line) handle industry guidance, coordination and oversight of federation-owned assets, while federation-owned enterprises (the "enterprise" line) operate by market rules. Understanding this "separation of cooperative and enterprise, connected top to bottom" dual-line mechanism is central to reading the governance and reform of the supply and marketing cooperatives.

What it does

Its core mandate concentrates on four business lines: agricultural input supply, farm-produce circulation, daily consumer-goods circulation, and recycling of renewable resources, extending into socialised agricultural services (such as farmland trusteeship, integrated plant protection, and drying/storage). It carries out prominent public functions in areas such as fertiliser supply security, farm-produce market access, county-level circulation and consumption-based poverty alleviation.

Why it matters for international readers

Compared with the international cooperative movement — known for member autonomy and bottom-up governance under the ICA's seven cooperative principles — China's supply and marketing cooperatives present a different institutional form: stronger government support, a top-down federation hierarchy, and a pronounced public-policy role. This difference is itself a valuable entry point for comparative study of cooperative-economy governance — the system keeps cooperation and services for agriculture at its core while embedding a distinctive governance structure.